09. Out of my comfort zone

In 2009, I wrote an article defending the use of lenses longer than 50mm in street photography. I wrote the piece for another website but it was never published. Perhaps it was too contentious. It didn’t criticize the use of short lenses on the street; or, certainly that was not my intention, even if some people might have construed it that way. But the fact that it was not published caused me to reflect that, perhaps I should explore the use of short lenses before I write anything else on the subject. So, during a trip to Hong Kong in the same year, I bought a Ricoh GRD III…with a 6mm fixed focal length lens!

For someone with a history of using telephoto lenses and tele-zooms, this was quite a departure. In my initial attempts with the new toy, the subjects I was trying to capture were miniscule. I was standing far too far away. Gradually, I got closer. But the closer I got, the more uncomfortable I felt; and this brought me to the question of why I had always preferred long lenses in the first place.

I’m essentially a shy person. Why that is the case would take up too much space to discuss; and besides, I am not trained as a psychologist and I doubt if I could talk objectively about it anyway, so I won’t bore you with my speculations. Let me just say that I am not the sort of person who can walk up to a complete stranger in the street, shove a camera in their face, and take a picture. I just can’t do it…or, I didn’t think I could. So the Ricoh immediately presented me with a dilemma: how do I get close enough to fill the frame with the shot I want to take, and still keep a comfortable distance from the subject?

My first thought was to shoot surreptitiously: “from the hip”. I started walking around with the camera in my hand, clicking at random, for practice rather than in expectation of taking a series of great shots; which was just as well because most of the shots I took were terrible. The exposure was often way off; the focus was often on the background rather than the subject; and on many occasions, I missed the subject completely. So I experimented with the camera’s controls looking for settings that would perform more reliably under these circumstances; and I practiced my aim to try to get the subject completely in the frame instead of completely or partially out of it. I was reminded of the first photograph I ever took. It was supposed to be of my mother in our back garden but I missed her completely and captured the garden shed instead. With the Ricoh, I really, I mean “literally” had to start learning how to take photographs all over again.

Gradually, with experiment and practice, I got better; and I began to appreciate the skill of photographers who can shoot “blind” and still get great results. But I was still too far away and I felt that people often knew that I was sneaking a shot of them and were reacting to it. This raises another issue about street photography for which I believe there is no “right or wrong” answer, just a personal preference: whether the photographer should be an unseen observer, not influencing the activity in any way; or whether he or she should be right in the thick of the action, engaging directly with the subject and even provoking a reaction. Personally, I have always tried to be the unseen observer. I have always felt that it was my role to photograph what would be happening on the street if I weren’t there; and I have read that some of the greats of street photography have followed a similar approach. But having said that, I have seen and enjoyed many superb photographs where the other approach was taken; so I reiterate my contention that there is no “right or wrong” answer to this; only personal preference, even if it is, for me,  simply a way of appeasing my shyness.

So, the problem facing me was still, how to get close without being detected. I read somewhere that Henri Cartier-Bression used to wrap his Leica in a handkerchief and pretend to blow his nose when he was taking a picture; so I got a small plastic bag with a black and white motif, cut a hole in it for the lens to poke through, placed the camera strategically in the bag, then held it in my hand as though it was my lunch or something. That worked up to a point. I felt that I could get closer without being detected, but all the shots I was taking where from a low angle looking up and that point of view didn’t always suit the subjects I was trying to capture.

I consulted a Flickr friend who is a long-time Ricoh user and he recommended getting a neck strap. That way, the camera is positioned higher and it can be easily raised to eye-height when necessary or appropriate. He also recommended getting a remote control for the shutter. Easier said than done in Sydney. Not many camera shops here stock the high-end Ricohs and accessories are even harder to find; but eventually I found a camera strap. It didn’t exactly fit the model of camera I had so I had to improvise; but I did manage to get it to work. The remote was a different story. I couldn’t find one anywhere. So now I am walking around like a tourist with a P&S camera slung round my neck, thumb glued to the shutter release button and twisting and turning to face my intended subjects like one of those clowns at the fairground where you try to throw balls into their mouths. Suddenly, I felt that I was more obvious than ever, and not just a little bit ridiculous; but the results were getting better, I think. And this is about where I am up to at the moment.

So how do I feel about short lenses now?

I reiterate that I was never anti- short lenses; just not habituated to their use. If I were more brazen and prepared to use the camera as it was intended to be used, I would be much happier.  I am accustomed to and therefore feel much more comfortable with looking through the viewfinder to frame and compose the elements of the image I am trying to take. I like that direct and deliberate approach to photography – a WYSIWYG approach, if you like. It makes me feel more in control of what I am doing; and it makes me feel as though the image produced is the result of decisions I have made and not just a happy accident or, at best, good guesswork. But then again, some of the happy accidents I have had with the Ricoh are quite exciting; and I can see the attraction for some in working that way. I do respect the skill of those who shoot “from the hip” (or from the belly, as in my case); but I don’t know if it will ever become my preferred way of working. This is a personal reflection, not an implied criticism; because there is nothing more exciting for me (in photography) than catching sight of a shot that cries out to be taken, raising my camera to my eye, focusing and firing. It is the atavistic reaction of the hunter; and it feels to me like what we were put here to do.

On the other hand, shooting from the hip or from inside a plastic bag feels, to me, sneakier than standing out in the open with a big camera, making no attempt to conceal what I am doing. Okay, with the tele-zoom I am standing farther away and the subject might not see me – that’s the whole point of being the unseen observer; but with my DSLR I don’t feel so much like I am skulking around trying to “steal” a shot. Again, this is how I feel and does not imply criticism of how other people work. If you are someone who can shoot from the hip without these pangs of conscience, more power too you!

Many of the shots I’ve taken with the Ricoh that turned out to my satisfaction I’ve felt were not really taken by me, but by the hand of some unseen Power guiding my hand. But then, you could always say that the same Power guided me, even when using my DSLR with its zoom lens, by alerting me to possible subjects as I passed on the street; but I do hope that, as my skills improve, I’ll begin to feel more like I am the one in control.

So, for me, the jury is still out on my personal relationship with the short lens. I feel that I am gradually making the transition from “point and hope” to “point and shoot”.  And I will persevere with the Ricoh because it is a marvelous piece of engineering with tremendous possibilities.

Welcome to sunny Spain!

The picture featured above was the first Ricoh shot I uploaded to Flickr. Since I wasn’t close to the people in the shot, I was able to take it in the conventional way, the way I feel most comfortable with, composing the scene through the viewer. I used the fastest possible shutter speed in the prevailing conditions (1/320 sec.) to “freeze” the snowflakes. Okay, I know that they were already frozen but you know what I mean.

Put a little sunshine in my life

My second Ricoh upload to Flickr (above) was a “hip” shot, full-frame (minimal crop); taken at a fast speed to minimize camera shake (1/2000) and f3.2 to give some depth of field leeway. What attracted me to this shot was the way the sunlight was catching the cup (hence the title of the shot). This was not a case of  “shoot everything and see what comes out” but rather a deliberate attempt to capture something that had caught my eye (the sunshine on the cup) in a proper street context of (a) the woman holding the cup and (b) the street in which the action was taking place. In this case, at least, had I had the courage to look through the viewer, I doubt that I would have composed the shot differently. But had I done that, the shot would have been different, because the woman would have realized what I was doing and would almost certainly have reacted to it.

Kissed by the sun

In my third Ricoh upload to Flickr (above), I find myself returning to familair territory, doing what I like to do with my DSLR, just to see if it can also be done with the vastly different Ricoh. In a series of shots taken in this location (the Barri Gotic in Barcelona at the end of an afternoon), I took some shots in the conventional way, composing through the viewer, which enabled me to get the focus and exposure settings and shooting distance right; but this shot was taken from the “hip”. Perhaps this type of compromise is the way for me to go until my “training wheels” can come off. It is exciting to cross new frontiers; but it is also comforting to come back to the familar.

My purpose in writing this piece is to seek advice and guidance from those of you who are more proficient in this kind of photography/technique than I am; or indeed from anyone who has an opinion on what I have written. So please let me know what you think.

PS: if you’d like to read the (previously) unpublished article, please click here; but beware, it may be construed as contraversial; although it was written with no malice intended.

PPS: the original article comprised only text. I added the photos only when I decided to publish the article on this website.

10 thoughts on “09. Out of my comfort zone

  1. Javier, at The Photo Forum had started a thread, “capture a stranger street style.”

    http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photo-themes/169495-capture-stranger-street-style-65.html#post1885601

    The above link will get you to it. I still subscribe to that thread, despite not doing any ‘street’ photography. I subscribe I think because the whole thing is so outside my comfort zone.

    Unfortunately, there is a ‘sameness’ about so many of the shots there. But occasionally there is something unusual and quite nice.

    Your approach to street photography has more of a ‘fine art’ emphasis, rather than just capturing a stranger. Of course, we just see what you allow us to see. Just as in my flickr photostream, only the images that have some meaning to me find their way in.

    So, I’ve got absolutely nothing constructive to offer. But I do look forward to seeing how your reinvention proceeds.

    • John, thank you for your comment and for the link. I’ve had a look and there’s some great stuff there. Thank you also for your description of my approach to street photography having more of a ‘fine art’ emphasis. In reality, today, street photography is not just one thing (as it was in Cartier-Bresson’s day when he was just inventing the genre). It seems to me that there are many sub-cultures in street photography and to be honest, I never go out shooting with any premedited style in mind. I just take whatever catches my eye. That is why my Flickr stream looks “all over the place”. I’m planning another blog piece on that subject, coming soon to a website near you! :-)

  2. Ok Look Good,

    I not understand all, But your Second picture is a good example of your capacity with your GRIII !

    I think the lens of the camera is a WYSIWYG (me I like IT)

    6mm fixed focal length lens = 28mm fixed focal length lens
    Near your D70 with No ZOOM

    For the Best RESULT Take the picture AT 1 Meter or 2 Meter or 3 Meter or 5 Meter of the subject

    Try Snap mode for help you (for quick shot)

    example :
    2,5 Meter parameter in snap Mode = evaluate 2,5 meter in your head, and press shutter

    Me I don’t use snap mode !
    I evaluate the distance in my head and I press Shutter,
    WYSIWYG Lens : the result is same like the eye seen

    Ok See You on your Photostream…

    (No I am In Paris, and I think now I live in Paris,
    But I have Just take 2 Series OF Picture I Have Not The Time TO take Picture, In MY 2 Series Of Photography, Not Really Good, But I have Make a Little selection)

  3. Fascinating to follow your account in to unfamiliar territory. I am all for learning something new and doing things different.
    I do wonder if Buckaroo Bob on flickr, a photo journalist that took shots from the hip and which ever way he could, might be helpful to you. He is a very experienced professional and a truly outstanding human being, I suggest you check him out:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/buckaroobob/

    I will be following your progress with great interest.

  4. The following is my “take” about street photography in general: It seems to me the location of shooting street photography is a critical component. There are a couple of aspects of location that I think strongly influences the type of the photographic outcome.

    1) There is the culture of the locale in which one is attempting to do street photography. Some cultures are more open to have their photo taken, while others, i.e. the Old Order Amish in North America consider it too “prideful” to allow their photo to be taken. It is difficult to generalize about taking street photos in different countries, because cultures vary drastically even within countries.
    2) I find that the more populated the locale, the more anonymous the photographer can be. So, during “rush hour” in parts of NYC there are so many people that the photographer becomes just part of the “background”. But to shoot street photos in small towns with less people the photographer becomes more conspicuous.

    So, I will tend to use a longer lens when I might be more conspicuous, and a shorter lens when I am standing in a crowd in center city Philadelphia.

    I have never tried “shooting from the hip”. I have seen some good photos of photographers who sometimes employ that technique, but that seems like a “crap shoot”, as there in no way to “frame” your photo composition. I can’t imagine getting many good images with any consistency using that method.

    That’s just my 2 cents, Keith.
    Rick

    • Rick,

      Once again, I can only agree with you. It’s funny, but sometimes I go out with both cameras and find myself swapping them as I move from street to street for exactly the reasons you gave. In a busy street, I find the GR III more convenient; but in open spaces, I’ll swap to the Nikon with a longer lens.

      As I said in my blog piece, I need to “get over” the feeling of “being deceitful” when I shoot from the hip. In the end, what you are doing is the same: trying to take a photo of someone without them knowing that you’re doing it. So, whether the camera is out in the open across the street, or up close in a plastic bag, the result is the same. I can reason this intellectually, but emotionally, I still have problems with the “sneaky” approach.

      Regarding “shooting from the hip”, it is a bit of a crap shoot, especially when, like me, you are new at the game. But I’ve seen some great work done that way and I’ll never know, I suppose, whether it was the result of skill or just one lucky shot out of a hundred failed attempts. It does take a lot of skill to shoot blind and I’m sure that skill can be perfected; but I have been composing shots through viewfinders for so many years that to take pictures in any other way seems very foreign to me and until I get better at it and more consistent I will continue to feel that there is more luck than skill in the outcome in my case.

      Thanks again for your comments. It’s so good to hear what others think about these things.

      Cheers, Keith

  5. keith …
    we have had private conversations on this very topic
    so I read both pieces with great interest. I am fascinated by this type of work, admire those who do it successfully and now I also have a decent small camera to try my hand. however the machinery does not make the photographer, and on my several outings I have been largely exasperated and unsuccessful. I do have one great shot, perfectly composed and exposed, of someone thoroughly pissed at being photographed. so much for surreptitious! for me the issue is the invasion of privacy, and not knowing legally or morally where the lines are drawn. I’m not sure it’s other than a very gray and murky area.

    • lynne, I agree that it is a gray area and the only opinion I’ve heard widely expressed among photographers of this ilk is that it is important to respect the people you photograph. Of course, that too can be interpreted in different ways and some would say that privacy itself should be respected. But what I believe is meant in this context is that, if we are going to photograph people candidly (i.e. without obtaining their permission prior to the event), we should do it in a way that doesn’t mock, or ridicule or embarrass the subject. But who can define what conforms to those mandates for any given individual. So, whichever way you look at it, the area is gray.

  6. intersting article. very honest too. love the final shot. and love the story re the garden shed.

    came here through ken tsangs link.

  7. Hi there Xpat,

    Great article but luckily for me I have no shyness when I have a camera in my hands…Its only when you take it away from me is there a problem!

    Seriously though I always work with a 24mm lens so I am very often sitting on people’s laps…figuratively…when I am shooting. I just love the frame it gives me, I really feel I can do stuff with it.

    That said I also believe that if you are shooting someone its nice for them to know and well I do have a few tricks of the trade for combatting people’s objections…

    But keep up the good work with the 6mm lens… that last shot looks bloody good to me!

    Cheers

    pjhoggers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s